Editorial (ran in Fredricksburg Free Lance Star November 7, 2004)
SOL progress hasn't meant greater overall student achievement If the SOL are so grand, why aren't other achievement scores rising? Date published: 11/7/2004
BEDFORD--We keep hearing from the governor, from his appointees charged with creating and keeping the SOL testing program going, and from pro-SOL journalists, that the SOL program is working and that feared negative effects haven't materialized. No one wishes this were so more than those of us with kids still in public schools. But wishing--and spinning with selected statistics--doesn't make it so. A complete and honest review of all available data shows that, unfortunately, rising achievement is not what the SOL have brought to our schools. The most recent instance is Gov. Mark Warner's claim--unquestioningly accepted by most papers--that 94.3 percent of the Class of 2004 graduated. He claims that graduation rates were not affected by SOL requirements. But the Class of 2004 lost about a quarter of its members between ninth grade and their senior year. Of the original group, 73.4 percent graduated with diplomas. The governor, however, defines graduation and, therefore, his reported graduation rate, to include not just "regular" diplomas but all diploma options, including Modified Standard and IEP diplomas (which do not count toward graduation under No Child Left Behind and do not mean the same as regular diplomas to most employers or colleges). This year, the number of students receiving Modified Standard or IEP diplomas jumped from 2,400 to more than 4,000. In fact, only 69.4 percent of the Class of 2004 earned a regular, i.e, Standard or Advanced Studies, diploma. This is a decrease from the 74.4 percent of the Class of 2003 who earned a regular diploma four years after entering ninth grade. As for Virginia students' scores on National Assessment of Educational Progress tests, the effects of the SOL have not been something to write home (or editorials) about.
Not all scores are
significant
Keep in mind that not all increases or decreases in
NAEP scores, or any other test scores, are statistically significant. The
NAEP reports themselves explicitly indicate whether particular changes are
statistically significant. Your selection of math scores on NAEP ["Not
out--but up!" Oct. 21] was clever--and selective. Math scores on NAEP have
improved across the nation, and Virginia was no exception.
However, Virginia students' average fourth- and
eighth-grade reading and writing scores for both white and
African-American students showed no statistically significant change from
1992 to 2003 for fourth grade or from 1998 to 2003 for eighth grade, the
earliest to the latest rounds of testing.
At the same time, fourth- and eighth-grade reading
and writing scores for those groups rose significantly in the rest of the
country. If elementary SOL language-arts pass rates, which have risen from
around 55 percent to around 72 percent between 1998 and 2003, signaled
increased learning, surely we should have seen some NAEP movement.
Meanwhile, Virginia's exclusion rate for NAEP has
been rising and, last time, was one of the highest in the United States.
Virginia students' reading and math scores on the
Stanford-9 and other norm-referenced tests have been above the national
average for about the past 20 years. Yet, while SOL test scores and pass
rates have steadily risen over the past five years, most Stanford-9 scores
did not significantly improve.
Scores on Stanford-9 reading and math did not
significantly improve from 1998 to 2002 in sixth-grade reading,
ninth-grade reading, and ninth-grade math. Only fourth-grade scores
improved in all three areas (reading, language, and math). However, as
the state's Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission has noted, the
rise in elementary scores should not be taken as an indication of
improvement across the board, given that scores tend to start low and then
rise when new tests are introduced and also given that scores in the upper
grades have remained flat for the past five years.
As scores on Stanford-9 remained flat or fell,
Virginia chose to drop the Stanford-9 as a required--and, therefore, as a
state-funded--component of the Virginia State Assessment Program (by 2003
General Assembly adoption of Governor Warner's proposal to eliminate
Stanford-9 funding).
Thus, Virginia will no longer have a way to compare
statewide student achievement with national norms.
SOL gains aren't
contagious
On top of the flat or falling changes in SAT scores
this year, Virginia also saw a decrease in the number of seniors who took
the SAT in 2004. Almost 600 fewer students took the SAT test in 2004 than
in 2003, while the total number of seniors rose. More importantly, this
SAT participation rate for public school students is the smallest
participation rate of the past seven years (i.e., since 1997, the year
before SOL testing started).
Virginia high school seniors' average SAT math
scores dropped one point from 2003 to 2004, and their average verbal
scores remained flat.
Virginia's average verbal score was 512, the same as
in 2003; the average math score was 507, compared with 508 in 2003.
Nationally, the average verbal score rose one point,
to 508, while the average math score fell one point, to 518.
And while Virginia's public schools, which use an
SOL-driven curriculum, saw flat or falling SAT scores, Virginia's private
schools saw theirs rising. The black-white score gap closed by six points
from 2003 to 2004, because of a six-point drop in white students' average
scores.
While some will dismiss these facts as more whining
by the anti-accountability crowd (otherwise known as mom and dad), keep in
mind that we aren't the only ones who have pointed out that rising SOL
pass rates have not been matched by achievement on other measures.
JLARC has noted that the "increase in SOL test
scores over time does not necessarily mean that Virginia students are
outperforming their national peers by a greater margin over time. Virginia
students' test scores have tended to be, on average, above the national
average over the years. However, a review of long-term trends in Virginia
scores does not suggest that Virginia students' performance relative to
national norm groups has changed greatly over time."
If rising SOL pass rates mean that our children are
learning more, why aren't other measures mirroring these gains? That's the
big question--one that no one seems to be interested in asking.
MICKEY VanDERWERKER is a member of the Bedford
County School Board and the founder of Parents Across Virginia United to
Reform SOLs.
Date published:
11/7/2004
|